Readers like you keep news free for everyone.
More than 5,000 readers have already pitched in to keep free access to The Journal.
For the price of one cup of coffee each week you can help keep paywalls away.
Sam Boal
Eamon Butterly, former manager of the Stardust, leaves the Rotunda last week after another day in the witness box at the Stardust Fire Inquests.
stardust inquest
Former Stardust manager tells inquest it was 'unsafe' to keep exit doors locked on disco nights
Eamon Butterly said ‘the consequences would be bad’ if the doors were locked during an emergency, but told the inquest that staff ‘would be keeping an eye on the doors’.
STARDUST MANAGER EAMON Butterly has told an inquest into the fire that killed 48 people in 1981 that the policy of keeping exit doors in the nightclub locked on disco nights was “unsafe” and they should not have been locked.
Mr Butterly said that “the consequences would be bad” if the doors were locked during an emergency, but he told the jury at the Dublin District Coroner’s Court that head doorman Tom Kennan and the staff “would be keeping an eye on the doors” and were able to open them at any stage.
Mr Butterly was being cross-examined today by Des Fahy KC, at the inquest into the blaze that swept through the Stardust in the early hours of February 14, 1981.
Mr Fahy, representing ten of the families of the deceased, said that during a tribunal before Mr Justice Ronan Keane in 1981, Mr Butterly gave evidence that exits one, six and five in the Stardust were locked up to a certain point on disco nights.
Mr Fahy said that Mr Butterly was asked what plan he had in place if an inspector turned up while the doors were locked, to which Mr Butterly had replied: “I had no plan, I would have been in serious trouble.”
Mr Fahy asked him who he would have been in trouble with, to which Mr Butterly replied that he would have been in trouble with an inspector or the gardaí.
“You were content with the policy where one, six and five were locked, but if anyone in a position of authority found out, you would be in serious trouble. So why did you let the doors be locked?” asked Mr Fahy.
“I don’t know, I can’t remember,” replied Mr Butterly.
Mr Fahy asked him if was uncomfortable because it was an unsafe practice to have the doors locked for any period of time.
“It would be, yeah, but the men that were in charge of it were in control that they could open them,” replied Mr Butterly.
“So, you’re accepting that it was unsafe?” asked Mr Fahy.
“I’m accepting that it was unsafe, but Mr Kennan had control over it,” said Mr Butterly.
“In what way was it unsafe?” asked Mr Fahy.
“They shouldn’t be locked, I suppose,” replied Mr Butterly.
Mr Fahy asked him what the natural consequences would have been of the doors being locked when people were trying to get out.
“The consequences would be bad if they were locked when something happened, but all the time Mr Kennan and the staff would be keeping an eye on the doors and would open them at any stage,” replied Mr Butterly.
Mr Butterly’s evidence continues this afternoon in the Pillar Room of the Rotunda Hospital.
